Idea of Hegel's &quote;Science of Logic&quote;

“Two determinations, insofar as they are opposed and inhere necessarily in one and the same concept, cannot be valid in their one-sidedness, each for itself, but . . . they have their truth only in their having been sublated [in ihrem Aufgehobensein], in the unity of their concept” (200)

it is non-Hegelian to refer to being as composed of essences and attributes or properties.

The reality of finite being is its manifestation or externalization of infinite being, i.e., spirit.

“Dasein emerges from becoming. It is the simple Einssein of being and nothing” (103)

“Becoming is an unceasing unrest that sinks down into a tranquil result” (100)

Becoming is not dissolution; it is the continuum within which dissolution and regeneration recur forever.

The difference between being and nothing is the dimensionality of the continuum; the sameness of being and nothing is its seamlessness.

since to say that being is one is to mention two things, being and unity.

Pure being cannot possess any determinations whatsoever, for then it would no longer be pure. That is, it would be some other category, such as becoming or existence.

Plato interprets “not” to mean “other” or, more abstractly, “otherness.” To say that the cow is not brown is then in fact to mean that the cow has some other color than brown.