Crit. True; mother earth herself is not a source of wealth to us if, instead of helping us to live, she helps us to starve.
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
Soc. And supposing another man's house to be entrusted to him, he would be able, if he chose, to manage it as skilfully as his own, would he not? since a man who is skilled in carpentry can
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
who will not forget that Socrates is the narrator throughout—speaking of himself as "I," and of Ischomachus as "he," or by his name.—
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
Crit. None at all: and a large salary he would be entitled to earn if, after paying the necessary expenses of the estate entrusted to him, he can create a surplus and improve the property.
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
Soc. "Has got"? but he may have got enemies? Crit. Yes, I am afraid some people have got a great many.
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
Crit. Certainly, in my opinion at any rate, everything which a man has got, even though some portion of it may lie in another part of the world from that in which he lives, (7) forms part of his estate.
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
Soc. Then there is no reason why a proficient in this art, even if he does not happen to possess wealth of his own, should not be paid a salary for managing a house, just as he might be paid for building one?
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
Soc. Then shall we say that a man's enemies form part of his possessions?
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
Crit. You seem to say, Socrates, that money itself in the pockets of a man who does not know how to use it is not wealth?
George Titusцитирует4 месяца назад
The flutes in question unsold are not wealth, being good for nothing: to become wealth they must be sold.