en

Erin Meyer

  • Leonid Panichцитирует10 дней назад
    or example, if you are building a global team that includes small groups of participants from four countries, choose one or two people from each country—the most internationally experienced of the bunch—to do most of the cross-cultural collaborating. Meanwhile, you can leave the others to work in the local way that is most natural to them. That way, you can have the innovation from the combination of cultures, while avoiding the inefficiency that comes with the clash of cultures.
  • Leonid Panichцитирует10 дней назад
    Second, think carefully about your larger objectives before you mix cultures up. If your goal is innovation or creativity, the more cultural diversity the better, as long as the process is managed carefully. But if your goal is simple speed and efficiency, then monocultural is probably better than multicultural. Sometimes, it is simply better to leave Rome to the Romans.
  • Leonid Panichцитирует10 дней назад
    worked hard to be the type of leader who is a facilitator among equals rather than a director giving orders from on high
  • Leonid Panichцитирует10 дней назад
    fan of tools like management by objectives and 360-degree feedback, which allow me to manage the team from more or less the same level as them.
  • Leonid Panichцитирует10 дней назад
    complaints about his Russian staff:

    1. They call me Mr. President

    2. They defer to my opinions

    3. They are reluctant to take initiative

    4. They ask for my constant approval

    5. They treat me like I am king
  • Leonid Panichцитирует10 дней назад
    This was the first of many such e-mails from various directors to fill my inbox. All problems are pushed up, up, up, and I do my best to nudge them way back down.” After all, as Jepsen told the IT manager, “You know the situation better than I do. You are the expert, not me.”
  • Leonid Panichцитирует10 дней назад
    Most people throughout the world claim to prefer an egalitarian style, and a large majority of managers say that they use an egalitarian approach themselves.
  • Leonid Panichцитирует6 дней назад
    Cognitive trust is based on the confidence you feel in another person’s accomplishments, skills, and reliability. This is trust that comes from the head
  • Leonid Panichцитирует6 дней назад
    Affective trust, on the other hand, arises from feelings of emotional closeness, empathy, or friendship. This type of trust comes from the heart.
  • Leonid Panichцитирует6 дней назад
    Ren’s culture, personal trust fundamentally shifts the way the two parties conduct business. By contrast, American managers make a concerted effort to ensure that personal relationships do not cloud the way they approach business interactions—in fact, they often deliberately restrict affective closeness with people they depend on for economic resources, such as budgeting or financing.
fb2epub
Перетащите файлы сюда, не более 5 за один раз